Dashboard Quality
Monitor workspace health, research quality scores, and agent performance from the dashboard.
Overview
The Praxiom dashboard includes a Quality Overview panel that surfaces key metrics about your workspace health and agent performance. These metrics help you understand how well the agent is performing, where data quality issues exist, and how research quality trends over time.
Quality Overview
The Quality Overview panel displays three metric cards and a per-workflow breakdown table. Data is fetched from GET /api/analytics/workspaces/{id}/harness.
Contract Pass Rate
The percentage of agent runs that passed post-flight contract evaluation. Contracts are algorithmic checks that verify the agent met minimum output requirements for each workflow type (e.g., synthesis must produce at least 3 insights with citations).
| Colour | Range | Meaning |
|---|---|---|
| Green | 80%+ | Healthy — agent is reliably meeting quality contracts |
| Amber | 50–80% | Warning — some runs are falling short |
| Red | Below 50% | Issues — many runs are failing quality checks |
The card also shows the verifier average score (0–100) from the independent Haiku verification agent.
Complexity Distribution
A donut chart showing how your queries break down by complexity:
| Segment | Colour | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Simple | Emerald | Single-step, direct responses |
| Medium | Amber | Multi-turn sessions with tool use |
| Complex | Indigo | Multi-agent missions with DAG execution |
This helps you understand whether your usage patterns match your plan — complex queries consume more credits per run.
Harness Overhead and Cost
- Harness overhead — Average milliseconds added by post-flight quality checks (contract evaluation + verifier). Typically 200–500ms.
- Average cost per run — Mean USD cost across all agent runs in the period.
Per-Workflow Breakdown
Below the metric cards, an expandable table breaks down quality by workflow type:
| Column | Description |
|---|---|
| Workflow | synthesis, recommendation, drafting, chat, pipeline |
| Runs | Total runs for this workflow |
| Contract % | Pass rate for this workflow |
| Verifier Score | Average independent verifier score |
| RQS | Research Quality Score for this workflow |
Workspace Health Card
The WorkspaceHealthCard shows the overall health status of your workspace data, powered by entropy scanning.
Health Status
- Healthy (green check) — No significant data quality issues detected
- Issues Found (amber warning) — One or more issues detected, broken down by severity:
- High severity (red) — Critical issues that actively degrade research quality
- Medium severity (amber) — Issues that may affect accuracy
- Low severity (muted) — Minor issues worth noting
Workspace Maturity
The card displays your workspace's maturity level based on total entropy scans completed:
| Level | Scans | Description |
|---|---|---|
| New | 0–10 | Just getting started — limited quality signal |
| Developing | 10–50 | Building up quality history |
| Mature | 50+ | Rich quality data for reliable trending |
Quality Trend Card
The QualityTrendCard shows your Research Quality Score (RQS) over the last 30 days as a sparkline chart.
RQS Grades
| Grade | Score | Colour | Meaning |
|---|---|---|---|
| A | 80%+ | Emerald | Excellent research quality |
| B | 60–80% | Blue | Good quality with room to improve |
| C | 40–60% | Amber | Moderate — check data quality issues |
| D | Below 40% | Red | Poor — likely data quality problems |
Trend Detection
The card compares the first half and second half of the 30-day window. If the difference exceeds ±5%, a trend indicator shows:
- Trending up — Quality is improving
- Trending down — Quality is declining
- Stable — No significant change
Quality Badges
Throughout the UI, quality scores appear as colour-coded badges:
| Badge | Where It Appears | What It Shows |
|---|---|---|
| RQS | Dashboard, conversation messages, workflow breakdown | Research Quality Score |
| RecQS | Recommendation cards, conversation messages | Recommendation Quality Score |
| DocQS | Document cards, conversation messages | Document Quality Score |
Badges use the same A/B/C/D colour scale as the trend card. They appear inline in conversation messages when the agent creates insights, recommendations, or documents.
What's Next
- Overnight Research Cycles — autonomous experiments scored by RQS
- Chat Agent — the Entropy Banner surfaces quality issues in chat
- Billing & Plans — how quality metrics relate to plan tiers
Was this helpful?